![]() ![]() VCC 2.0/VMR after the update feels very snappy. I was easily one of the more skeptical people here when it came to the idea of only having VCC 2.0 available within the vm rack, but after giving it a quick go, I can't really say that I care anymore. Job well done on the sound and additional console Steve, Fabrice, and "the minions" Wouldn't it be great if even multiple VMR modules could have the "junk" around the sides minimized?Īll in all though, aside from this gui stuff, this new plug KICKS ASS!. Slate has to implement (or it would be highly appreciated if they did implement) some resizable gui, or a way to minimize all the extra "crap" that surrounds a module. like logic, or EVEN PT, which is the WORST). nothing else (especially in Ableton, where they don't have any huge or pointless "wrap" around every 3rd-Party plug. Originally, it was just one module, and it took up only enough space as that one module. this is exactly why I was pissed about having to use this VMR rack with VCC. Right now it's *huge* which may appropriate for Slate's touch screen workstation but I would love if I could set the whole rack to be about 60-75% of its current size.cant agree with you more. For that matter it would be good of if you could select a magnification level. ![]() When I have just one module in I don't want to have empty rack spaces wasting my screen. ![]() I doubt Slate will abandon the concept any time soon, so we just need to petition for user customization of the rack. I can appreciate how the programming framework of the rack might make programming and support easier.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |